Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Filing 233

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/10/11 ORDERING that the parties may submit letter briefs with additional citations to cases applicable to the mental privacy issue raised in this case no later than Friday, 6/10/11. The parties ' joint statement of undisputed facts is due no later than 6/17 and their separate statements of disputed facts are due by 6/24/11. In light of the pending motion for summary judgment, the court vacates the dates for the submission of the joint pretrial statement and for final pretrial conference and sets the following dates: The joint pretrial statement is now due 7/20/11 and final pretrial conference will be held on 7/27/11 at 10:00 a.m; motions in limine are due by 8/8/11 and will be heard the first day of trial. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEREMY GILMORE AND DANA GILMORE, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 No. CIV S-09-2180 KJM DAD vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., ORDER 13 Defendants. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 The parties may submit letter briefs with additional citations to cases applicable to the mental privacy issue raised in this case no later than Friday, June 10, 2011. The parties’ joint statement of undisputed facts is due no later than June 17 and their separate statements of disputed facts are due by June 24, 2011. In light of the pending motion for summary judgment, the court vacates the dates 20 for the submission of the joint pretrial statement and for final pretrial conference and sets the 21 following dates: The joint pretrial statement is now due July 20, 2011 and final pretrial 22 conference will be held on July 27, 2011 at 10:00 a.m; motions in limine are due by August 8, 23 2011 and will be heard the first day of trial. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 10, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?