Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/19/10, ordering that for the reasons stated on the record, the parties' motions for sanctions 53 , 64 are DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Doc. 71

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw Ddad1\orders.civil\gilmore2180.oah.091710

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY GILMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., ORDER / This matter came before the court on September 17, 2010, for hearing on the parties' cross-motions for costs, fees and sanctions related to the deposition of Andrew Ribbing. Larry Lockshin, Esq. appeared for plaintiffs. Brian W. Plummer, Esq. appeared for defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. The parties' Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Dispute was considered, along with their arguments at the hearing. Both motions (Docs. No. 53, 64) were denied for the reasons stated on the record. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 19, 2010. No. CIV S-09-02180 JAM DAD

Dockets.Justia.com