Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Filing 92

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/26/10 ORDERING that the expert disclosure deadline is extended to 11/5/2010. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEPHANIE L. QUINN, ESQ. [SBN: 216655] NAISHA COVARRUBIAS, ESQ. [SBN:239499] RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP 1030 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 General: 916.443.4443 Facsimile: 916.443.2124 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY GILMORE AND DANA GILMORE, Plaintiffs v. Case No. 2:09-02180-JAM-DAD STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, DENNIS MAGURES, JOHN PARKER, CAROLYN M. WILL, ANDREW RIBBING and LEO MARIN and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURES The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to further extend the time for expert disclosures from the previously agreed date of October 29, 2010 to November 5, 2010. Dated: October 25, 2010 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP By /s/ Stephanie L. Quinn STEPHANIE L. QUINN Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY -1- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 25, 2010 LARRY LOCKSHIN, ESQ. A Law Corporation By __/s/ Larry Lockshin LARRY LOCKSHIN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs JEREMY and DANA GILMORE IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: October 26, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -2PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?