Wilson v. Wever et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/23/2012 ORDERING that the 62 findings and recommendations filed 6/26/2012, are ADOPTED in full. This action shall proceed as against defendants Sandra Lee Wever and William Proffitt only. The following defendants are DISMISSED: Mary Daved, James Bueler, Shawn Webber, Maria Webber, and Dave Wever. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE WILSON, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 No. 2:09-CV-2191-LKK-CMK-P ORDER SANDRA LEE WEVER, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On June 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2012, are adopted in 2. This action shall proceed as against defendants Sandra Lee Wever and 3 4 5 6 7 8 full; William Proffitt only; and 3. The following defendants are dismissed: Mary Daved, James Bueler, Shawn Webber, Maria Webber, and Dave Wever. DATED: August 23, 2012. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?