Hayes v. Stewart et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/24/2011 DENYING pltf's 9 motion for relief from judgment. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY C. HAYES, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 vs. RODERICK STEWART, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-09-2201 EFB P Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel. This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 17 plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On 18 March 24, 2010, the court dismissed this action because he was barred from proceeding in forma 19 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and had failed to pay the filing fee for this action as 20 directed by the court. Dckt. No. 7. Judgment was entered accordingly. Dckt. No. 8. On May 21 11, 2011, plaintiff submitted a motion for relief from judgment based on excusable neglect. 22 Dckt. No. 9. 23 Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows: 24 On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or 25 26 1 1 2 extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason that justifies relief. 3 4 5 Plaintiff does not demonstrate he is entitled to relief from judgment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 11, 2011 motion for relief 6 from judgment, is denied. 7 Dated: May 24, 2011. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?