Mishra et al v. Greenpoint Mortgage et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 10/9/09. Each party to bear her or its own costs and attys' fees. CASE CLOSED.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP 888 West 6th Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KALIKA MISHRA and VIDOTHMA MISHRA, Plaintiffs, vs. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE, GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, SUCCESS ONE FINANCIAL, ERNEST CUNAMAY AND DOES 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:09-cv-02225-FCD-EFB ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION [FRCP 41(a)] [filed: July 6, 2009; removed August 11, 2009] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs Kalika Mishra and Vidothma Mishra and Defendant GMAC Mortgage, LLC stipulated, pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 41(a), that all claims and demands asserted by Plaintiffs in this action shall be dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys fees. It appears to the Court that the terms of the stipulation appear proper, and upon good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims and demands asserted by Plaintiffs Kalika Mishra and Vidothma Mishra in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed -1ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP 888 West 6th Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 without prejudice, each party to bear her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. All pending hearings are hereby vacated without prejudice. DATED: October 9, 2009 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?