Koerner v. Astrue

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/13/12; IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed February 17, 2012, are ADOPTED and Plaintiff's request for EAJA fees is granted and plaintiff is awarded $5,178.28 in attorney&# 039;s fees under EAJA, said fees made payable to plaintiff; however, plaintiff is to in turn pay these fees to his attorney. Plaintiff's request for fees under 42 U.S.C 406(b) is granted in the amount of $6,159.72. The Commissioner is dire cted to pay plaintiff's counsel the sum of $6,159.72 in § 406(b) attorneys' fees with the remainder withheld from the back benefits ($5,178.28), i.e., the amount of EAJA fees, to be disbursed to plaintiff. The sum payable to plaintiff's counsel shall be increased by any administrative offset imposed on the EAJA fee.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS KOERNER, 11 Plaintiff, vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-2240 LKK GGH (TEMP) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER 14 15 Defendant. __________________________________/ On February 17, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 16 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 19 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed 26 February 17, 2012, are ADOPTED and 1 1 1. Plaintiff’s request for EAJA fees is granted and plaintiff is awarded $5,178.28 2 in attorney’s fees under EAJA, said fees made payable to plaintiff; however, plaintiff is to in turn 3 pay these fees to his attorney. 4 2. Plaintiff’s request for fees under 42 U.S.C 406(b) is granted in the amount of 5 $6,159.72. The Commissioner is directed to pay plaintiff’s counsel the sum of $6,159.72 in 6 § 406(b) attorneys’ fees with the remainder withheld from the back benefits ($5,178.28), i.e. , 7 the amount of EAJA fees, to be disbursed to plaintiff. The sum payable to plaintiff’s counsel 8 shall be increased by any administrative offset imposed on the EAJA fee. 9 DATED: March 13, 2012. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?