Mitchell v. Skyline Homes

Filing 113

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/1/2011 ORDERING 109 Close of class certification discovery due by 10/11/2011; and Motion for class certification due by 12/20/2011. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jeff D. Friedman (173886) Shana E. Scarlett (217895) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 jefff@hbsslaw.com shanas@hbsslaw.com Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 CHRISTINA MITCHELL, DAWN WRIGHT AND JERRY WRIGHT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 v. SKYLINE HOMES, INC., 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 010153-11 456003 V1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:09-CV-02241-GGH (TEMP) STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND OTHER CASE DEADLINES ACTION FILED: June 29, 2009 1 WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this action on June 29, 2009; 2 WHEREAS on June 4, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint; 3 WHEREAS on September 24, 2010, Judge Mueller granted in part and denied in part 4 the motion to dismiss; 5 WHEREAS on October 12, 2010, Skyline Homes, Inc. (“Skyline”) filed its answer to 6 the Second Amended Complaint, and on December 3, 2010, filed its amended answer to the 7 Second Amended Complaint; 8 WHEREAS on October 13, 2010, the parties held a status conference before Judge 9 Mueller, wherein the Defendant represented that it would have completed its production of 10 documents in response to Plaintiffs’ initial document production requests by November 19, 11 2010; 12 WHEREAS Plaintiffs agreed to the class certification deadlines based on Defendant’s 13 representation that it would have completed its initial production of documents by November 14 19, 2010; 15 WHEREAS after motion practice, on June 16, 2011, this Court ordered that Defendant 16 produce certain Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses for depositions within 45 days, or by August 1, 2011,; 17 18 WHEREAS the current close of discovery for issues related to class certification is August 2, 2011; 19 WHEREAS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and subject to approval by 20 the Court, the parties stipulate to an extension of time on the close of discovery relating to class 21 certification and the last day for filing of Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for 90 days; 22 and 23 24 WHEREAS the parties previously requested any extension of the schedule on April 5, 2011, and it was approved by this Court on April 18, 2011; 25 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between 26 the undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendant, subject to the approval of the 27 Court that the existing scheduling order shall be modified as follows: -1- 28 STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. RE CLASS CERT. SCHEDULE – 010153-11 456003 V1 Case No. 2:09-CV-02241-GGH (TEMP) 1 2 3 4 5 Event Current Schedule Proposed Schedule Close of class certification discovery August 2, 2011 October 11, 2011 Motion for class certification October 11, 2011 December 20, 2011 6 7 Dated: June 27, 2011 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 8 By 9 10 /s/ Shana E. Scarlett SHANA E. SCARLETT Jeff D. Friedman (173886) 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 jefff@hbsslaw.com shanas@hbsslaw.com 11 12 13 14 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com 15 16 17 18 Eugene P. Haydu (136174) LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE P. HAYDU 965 University Avenue, Suite 222 Sacramento, CA 95825-6736 Telephone: (916) 437-1650 Facsimile: (916) 437-1655 gene@haydulaw.com 19 20 21 22 25 Craig G. McIntosh, Esq. (37596) LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG G. MCINTOSH 3017 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 300 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 788-7225 Facsimile: (916) 988-6961 cgm@rcjp.com 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 24 27 28 STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. RE CLASS CERT. SCHEDULE – Case No. 2:09-CV-02241-GGH (TEMP) 010153-11 456003 V1 -2- 1 Dated: June 27, 2011 TUCKER ELLIS & WEST LLP 2 By 3 4 /s/ Samantha Tisdale (as authorized on June 27, 2011) SAMANTHA TISDALE Matthew I. Kaplan (177242) 515 South Flower Street, Forty-Second Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2223 Telephone: (213) 430-3220 Facsimile: (213) 430-3409 matthew.kaplan@tuckerellis.com samantha.tisdale@tuckerellis.com 5 6 7 8 Daniel J. Kelly Sara K. Beede (258425) TUCKER ELLIS & WEST LLP 135 Main Street, Ste. 700 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 617.2400 Facsimile: (415) 617.2409 Daniel.kelly@tuckerellis.com Sara.beede@tuckerellis.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant Skyline Homes, Inc. 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July, 1, 2011 19 s/s Gregory G. Hollows MAGISTRATE JUDGE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. RE CLASS CERT. SCHEDULE – Case No. 2:09-CV-02241-GGH (TEMP) 010153-11 456003 V1 -3- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 27, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 3 the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail 4 addresses registered, as denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify 5 that I have mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non- 6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 7 /s/ Shana E. Scarlett SHANA E. SCARLETT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. RE CLASS CERT. SCHEDULE – Case No. 2:09-CV-02241-GGH (TEMP) 010153-11 456003 V1 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?