Mitchell v. Skyline Homes

Filing 203

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/9/12 ORDERING that the 2/22/12 hearing on plaintiffs motion to dismiss is VACATED. Plaintiffs have clarified in the briefing that they will stipulate to dismissal of their claims with prejudice. Under these circumstances, conditioning dismissal on payment of defense fees and costs is not warranted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Dawn Wright and Jerry Wright are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA MITCHELL, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-2241 CKD vs. SKYLINE HOMES, 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 Calendared for hearing on February 22, 2012 is plaintiffs Jerry and Dawn 17 Wright’s motion to dismiss. Because oral argument is not of material assistance, this matter is 18 submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). Upon review of the documents in support and 19 opposition, and good cause appearing, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 20 1. The February 22, 2012 hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is vacated. 21 2. Plaintiffs have clarified in the briefing that they will stipulate to dismissal of 22 their claims with prejudice. Under these circumstances, conditioning dismissal on payment of 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 defense fees and costs is not warranted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Plaintiffs Jerry Wright and 2 Dawn Wright are dismissed from this action with prejudice. 3 Dated: February 9, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 mitchell.dis 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?