McMurray v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 88

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/6/2012 ORDERING the trial scheduled to commence on 2/7/2012, is VACATED; Further, in light of Plaintiff's representation that "all issues and all claims" have settled, this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

VALETTA McMURRAY,
Plaintiff,

9
v.

10

12

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DEPUTY
SHERIFF JAVIER BUSTAMANTE, and
DEPUTY SHERIFF L. CULP,

13

Defendants.
________________________________

11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:09-cv-02245-GEB-EFB
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

14
15

Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement on February 6, 2012, in

16

which she states, “the parties have settled all issues and all claims.”

17

(ECF No. 87.) Plaintiff also requests that “the trial now set for

18

February 7, 2012, be vacated.” Id.

19

Trial scheduled to commence on February 7, 2012, is vacated.

20

Further, in light of Plaintiff’s representation that “all issues and all

21

claims” have settled, this action is dismissed.

22

Dated:

February 6, 2012

23
24
25

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1