Schinkel v. Board of Parole Hearings
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/05/10 denying 9 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
(HC) Schinkel v. Board of Parole Hearings
Doc. 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:sj schi2247.ifp
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL E. SCHINKEL, Petitioner, vs. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, Respondent. / On October 21 2009, petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner, however, has already paid the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's October 21, 2009 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 9) is denied as unnecessary. DATED: October 5, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-2247 FCD DAD P
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
