Parkison v. Butte County Sheriff's Dept. et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/1/2012 GRANTING 48 Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment 31 , 42 ; Plaintiff's motion for the court to conti nue the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from 5/11/2012, to 5/25/2012 is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall file any opposition papers no later than 15 days prior to 5/25/2012 law and motion hearing date Defendants shall file a reply, if any, in accordance with Local Rule 230(d).(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GRANT S. PARKISON et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12
13

No. CIV S-09-2257 DAD P

vs.
BUTTE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEP’T et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

Counsel for plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to

17

defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Counsel has also requested that the court continue

18

the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012.

19

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

20

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’

21

motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is granted;

22

2. Plaintiff’s motion for the court to continue the law and motion hearing date

23

scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012 (Doc. No. 48) is granted; and

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

3. Plaintiff shall file any opposition papers no later than fifteen (15) days prior to

2

May 25, 2012 law and motion hearing date. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, in accordance

3

with Local Rule 230(d).

4

DATED: May 1, 2012.

5
6
7
8

DAD:9
park2257.36opp

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2