McElroy v. Haviland et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/7/10 adopting 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; 10 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and respondent shall file an answer to the petitioner within 30 days from the date of this order.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 26, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: //// 1 ORDER JAMES McELROY, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2259-GEB-KJN-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Respondent's February 2, 2010, motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 10) is denied and respondent shall file an answer to the petitioner within 30 days from the date of this order. Dated: May 7, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?