Andrade v Cate
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/20/14 ORDERING that counsel for petitioner shall file a motion to withdraw within 7 days of the date of this order.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADRIAN FRANK ANDRADE,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:09-cv-02270 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
MATTHEW CATE,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with an application for a writ of habeas corpus
17
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 12, 2014 this court ordered petitioner’s counsel of record,
19
Donald Masuda and Kenny Giffard, to show cause why their ongoing representation of petitioner
20
is not burdened by a conflict of interest in light of this court’s September 24, 2013 order granting
21
petitioner’s pro se motion for relief from judgment based on his abandonment by counsel. See
22
ECF Nos 35, 24. On June 13, 2014 petitioner’s counsel filed a response to the order to show
23
cause indicating that they do not intend to continue representing petitioner in the instant matter
24
and would file a motion to withdraw pursuant to Local Rule 182(d). ECF No. 36. However, no
25
such motion to withdraw has been filed to date. Counsel is once again reminded that the court is
26
unable to set a further briefing schedule on petitioner’s habeas corpus application, which dates
27
back to 2009, until the status of counsel is determined with certainty.
28
////
1
1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall file a motion to
2
withdraw within 7 days of the date of this order.
3
DATED: June 20, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?