Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 107

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 03/04/11 ORDERING that dft Interactive Intelligence's 105 Request for Telephonic Appearance is GRANTED. The courtroom deputy shall initiate the call. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al. Doc. 107 Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com Attorney for Defendants SKYLUX INC., SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, and INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice) STEWART & IRWIN, P.C. 251 E. Ohio Street Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317-639-5454 Fax: 317-632-1319 clindman@silegal.com Attorney for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION Case No. 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-KJN MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT Hon. William B. Shubb LTD, Plaintiff, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: On the request to appear by telephone by Constance R. Lindman, counsel for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. at the hearing now calendared for March 28, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. on the following: 1 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN Date: Time: Ctrm: March 28, 2011 2:00 p.m. 5 Dockets.Justia.com o o Status Conference Motion by Interactive Intelligence, Inc. to Vacate Stay and Dismiss all Claims Against it in the Fourth Amended Complaint. The Court hereby rules as follows: The Request is GRANTED. The courtroom deputy shall initiate the conference call to counsel at (317) 639-5454. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2011 -iiREQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?