Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 141

ORDER re: Arbitration Fees and Expenses signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/31/2012 ORDERING that Shannon Callnet reimburse Interactive the sum of $1,100.00 bases on the arbitration fees and expenses Interactive paid. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---11 12 MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH; SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD, 13 Plaintiffs, NO. CIV. 2:09-2304 WBS KJN 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER RE: ARBITRATION FEES AND EXPENSES v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. / 20 21 22 ----oo0oo---Plaintiff Shannon Callnet Pvt. Ltd. (“Shannon Callnet”) 23 and defendant Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (“Interactive”) 24 engaged in mandatory arbitration of Shannon Callnet’s claims 25 against Interactive and the arbitrator found in favor of 26 Interactive. 27 arbitrator’s award and entered judgment in favor of Interactive 28 pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9. On August 3, 2012, the court confirmed the (Docket Nos. 131, 132.) 1 In its Order 1 confirming the arbitrator’s award, the court did not address the 2 arbitrator’s determination that Shannon Callnet should reimburse 3 Interactive $1,100.00 for the fees and expenses Interactive had 4 paid for the arbitration. 5 Specifically, the arbitrator found: The costs of this arbitration shall be borne [by] Claimant by reason of Claimant’s failure to participate in the proceeding. Accordingly, the administrative fees and expenses of the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (“ICDR”) totaling $3,125.00 shall be borne by Claimant, and the compensation of the Arbitrator totaling $1,856.25 shall be borne by Claimant. Therefore, Claimant shall reimburse Respondent the sum of $1,100.00, representing that portion of said fees and expenses previously incurred by Respondent. 6 7 8 9 10 11 (Docket No. 139-1 at 6.) 12 Shannon Callnet does not object to confirmation of the 13 arbitrator’s determination that it reimburse Interactive 14 $1,100.00 for the fees and expenses Interactive paid toward the 15 arbitration and the court sees no reason why it should depart 16 from the arbitrator’s determination. 17 Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 110 (2d Cir. 2006) 18 (“Normally, confirmation of an arbitration award is ‘a summary 19 proceeding that merely makes what is already a final arbitration 20 award a judgment of the court,’ and the court ‘must grant’ the 21 award ‘unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected.’” 22 (quoting Florasynth, Inc. v. Pickholz, 750 F.2d 171, 176 (2d Cir. 23 1984) and 9 U.S.C. § 9)). 24 See generally D.H. Blair & IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Shannon Callnet reimburse 25 Interactive the sum of $1,100.00 based on the arbitration fees 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 and expenses Interactive paid. 2 DATED: August 31, 2012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?