Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 151

STIPULATION and ORDER 150 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/14/12; IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs are granted permission to file the Sixth Amended Complaint, attached as EXHIBIT 1 to the stipulation entered by the parties.(Matson, R)

1
2
3

JAY IAN ABOUDI (SBN: 251984)
THE LAW OFFICE OF JAY IAN ABOUDI
1855 Olympic Blvd., Ste. 210
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6

Attorney for Plaintiffs
MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL
SINGH
and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11
12

MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL
SINGH; SHANNON CALLNET PVT
LTD,

13

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO AMEND
COMPLAINT

14
15

v.

16
17
18
19

SKYLUX INC., MUJEEB
PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX
TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive.
Defendants.

20
21
22
23

WHEREAS:

24

1.

On October 26, 2012, the Court issued an order (DKT 148) granting

25

the motion to dismiss the first, second, third, fifth, and seventh causes of action by

26

Defendants SKYLUX, INC. (“Skylux”), SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD.,

27

(“STPL”), and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH (“Puzhakkaraillath,”

28

collectively with Skylux and STPL, the “Skylux Defendants”);
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2.

1

On November 7, 2012, Plaintiffs filed its Fifth Amended Complaint

2

(“5AC” or “Complaint”) pursuant to the Court’s October 26, 2012 Order.

3

Although Plaintiff SHANNON CALLNET’s claims against INTERACTIVE

4

INTELLIGENCE, INC. (“INTERACTIVE”) had previously been dismissed with

5

prejudice and a judgment was previously entered against Plaintiff SHANNON

6

CALLNET on those claims pursuant to an arbitration proceeding, INTERACTIVE

7

was still identified as a defendant in the caption, preamble, Paragraph 4 of the

8

Complaint, and the civil cover sheet filed therewith.
3.

9

INTERACTIVE’s attorney contacted Plaintiffs’ attorney on

10

November 8, 2012 concerning the matter. Plaintiffs have therefore agreed to

11

amend the Complaint without prejudice to their rights under the Federal Rules, and

12

for the limited purpose of removing INTERACTIVE as a defendant from the

13

caption, preamble, Paragraph 4, of the Complaint, and the civil cover sheet filed

14

therewith;
4.

15

Defendants have consented to Plaintiffs amending its Complaint for

16

the limited purpose described above, and without prejudice to their rights under the

17

Federal Rules.

18

//

19

//

20

//

21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein,

2

STIPULATE AND AGREE to the filing of the Sixth Amended Complaint attached

3

hereto as EXHIBIT 1.

4

Dated: November 9, 2012
/s/ Jay Ian Aboudi
JAY IAN ABOUDI
Attorney for Plaintiffs MOHIT
RANDHAWA, aka HARPAL
SINGH and SHANNON
CALLNET PVT LTD.

5
6
7
8
9
10

Dated: November 9, 2012

11

STEWART & IRWIN, PC
/s/Constance R. Lindman
CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN
Attorney for INTERACTIVE
INTELLIGENCE, INC

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Dated: November 9, 2012

BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS
/s/Gregg A. Rapoport
GREGG A. RAPOPORT
Attorney for Defendants
SKYLUX, INC., MUJEEB
PUZHAKKARAILLATH and SKYLUX
TELELINK PVT LTD

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ORDER

1
2

Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT

3

Plaintiffs are granted permission to file the Sixth Amended Complaint, attached as

4

EXHIBIT 1 to the stipulation entered by the parties.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: November 14, 2012

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER