Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/1/2009 GRANTING 18 Interactive Intelligence, Inc. request to appear telephonically, at the hearing set for 10/13/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LAW CORP. 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 Direct Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice) OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 740 W. Green Meadows Dr., Ste 300 Greenfield, IN 46140 Tel. 317-891-1500 Fax. 866-283-8549 crlindman@overhauser.com Attorneys for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH, Plaintiff, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN Date: Time: Ctrm: October 13, 2009 2:00 p.m. 5 Case No. 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-DAD Hon. William B. Shubb TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: On the request to appear by telephone by Constance R. Lindman, counsel pro hac vice for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. ("Interactive"), at the hearing now calendared for October 13, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. on Interactive's Motion to Dismiss Claims, the Court hereby rules as follows: -1ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Request is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 1, 2009 -2ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?