Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER 48 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/14/10, ORDERING that the time within which dfts shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint is EXT by seven (7) calendar days. (Kastilahn, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LAW CORP. 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 Direct Tel. [phone] Fax. [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Defendants SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH, and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD, Plaintiffs, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive. Defendants. WHEREAS: 1. Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa and Shannon Callnet Pvt Ltd. ("Plaintiffs") filed a Second Amended Complaint on January 6, 2010, following orders by the Court on November 3, 2009 (Docket No. 27),
_____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT -1-

Case No.: 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-DAD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

on December 2, 2009 (Docket No. 36), and on December 21, 2009 (Docket No. 37); 2. 3. In the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs have added a new Defendant, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD. ("STPL"). STPL is represented in this action by Gregg A. Rapoport, who is counsel of record for Defendants SKYLUX INC. ("Skylux") and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH ("Puzhakkaraillath"), as well as co-counsel for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. 4. Mr. Rapoport has agreed to accept service and acknowledge receipt of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on behalf of STPL, when provided by Plaintiffs. 5. The current deadline for Defendants Skylux and Puzhakkaraillath to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is January 20, 2010 (14 days after its filing, pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Defendants' counsel have requested a seven (7) day extension of time within which to file responses to the Second Amended Complaint, and anticipate that responses by all Defendants will be filed at that time. This request is made in part due to Mr. Rapoport's required jury service during the week of January 18th. 7. /// /// /// Plaintiffs' counsel has agreed to this request.

_____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT -2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein, now STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: The time within which Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint shall be extended by seven (7) calendar days. DATED: January __, 2010 BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS /s/ GREGG A. RAPOPORT Attorneys for Defendants INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC SKYLUX, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH and SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD DATED: January 14, 2010 OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC /s/ CONSTANCE LINDMAN Attorneys for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC DATED: January 13, 2010 THE LAW OFFICE OF JAY IAN ABOUDI /s/ JAY ABOUDI Attorney for Plaintiffs MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD

_____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT -3-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ORDER Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT The time within which Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint shall be extended by seven (7) calendar days. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 14, 2010

_____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT -4-