Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 53

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 02/02/10 ORDERING that counsel Constance R. Lindman's 52 Request to appear telephonically for the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com Attorney for Defendants SKYLUX INC., SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, and INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice) OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 740 W. Green Meadows Dr., Ste. 300 Greenfield, IN 46140 Tel. 317-891-1500 Fax. 866-283-8549 crlindman@overhauser.com Attorney for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION Case No. 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-DAD MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT Hon. William B. Shubb LTD, Plaintiff, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: On the request to appear by telephone by Constance R. Lindman, counsel for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. ("Interactive"), at the hearing ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN Date: Time: Ctrm: March 1, 2010 2:00 p.m. 5 -1ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on Defendants' motions to dismiss and transfer venue, calendared for March 1, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., the Court rules as follows: The Request is GRANTED. Constance R. Lindman may appear by telephone at the above-referenced hearing on March 1, 2010, or on such other date when the hearing is held. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 2, 2010 -2ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?