Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.

Filing 72

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/28/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave 65 now set for hearing on 5/24/10, is CONTINUED to 6/7/2010 at 02:00 PM. And the notice date for Interactive's MOTION to DISMISS 69 is CHANGED from 5/24/10 to 6/7/2010 at 02:00 PM.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105 Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com Attorney for Defendants SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice) OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 740 W. Green Meadows Dr., Ste. 300 Greenfield, IN 46140 Tel. 317-891-1500 Fax. 866-283-8549 crlindman@overhauser.com Attorneys for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH, and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD, Plaintiffs, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive. Defendants. WHEREAS: 1. On April 6, 2010, Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa and Shannon Callnet Pvt Ltd. ("Shannon Callnet") filed a Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT INTERACTIVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE -1- Case No. 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-KJN Hon. William B. Shubb STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT INTERACTIVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Complaint (Docket No. 65) (the "Motion for Leave"). The hearing on this Motion is set for May 24, 2010. 2. On April 26, 2010, Defendant Interactive Intelligence, Inc. ("Interactive") filed a Motion to Dismiss Claims by Plaintiff Shannon Callnet and for Sanctions (Docket No. 69) (the "Motion to Dismiss"). 3. Interactive noticed the Motion to Dismiss for the same date as the Motion for Leave because the issues presented in the Motion for Leave and the Motion to Dismiss are related. Shannon Callnet seeks leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint that includes claims against Interactive. (Dkt 65 Ex 1) Interactive contends that the proposed Fourth Amended Complaint does not comply with this Court's March 4 Order (Dkt 61), Shannon Callnet should not be permitted to bring claims against Interactive in a Fourth Amended Complaint, and Shannon Callnet's claims against Interactive should be dismissed. Interactive agrees that if Shannon Callnet files a cross-motion for sanctions against Interactive, Shannon Callnet may notice such motion for June 7, 2010. 4. In order to avoid unnecessary expense and effort for both the Court and the parties, the parties, through their respective counsel of record herein, agree that it is in the interest of judicial economy to combine the hearing on the Motion for Leave and the Motion to Dismiss because the issues presented are related. NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein, STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave, now set for hearing on May 24, 2010, is continued to June 7, 2010. The notice date for Interactive's Motion to Dismiss is changed from May 24, 2010 to June 7, 2010. _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT INTERACTIVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED: April 28, 2010 OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC /s/ Constance R. Lindman CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN Attorney for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC DATED: April 28, 2010 BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport GREGG A. RAPOPORT [authorized signature] Attorney for Defendants INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC SKYLUX, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH and SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD DATED: April 28, 2010 THE LAW OFFICE OF JAY IAN ABOUDI /s/ Jay Ian Aboudi [authorized signature] JAY ABOUDI Attorney for Plaintiffs MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT INTERACTIVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave, now set for hearing on May 24, 2010, is continued to June 7, 2010at 2:00 p.m. and the notice date for Interactive's Motion to Dismiss is changed from May 24, 2010 to June 7, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 28, 2010 _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT INTERACTIVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?