Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.
Filing
85
ORDER granting 65 Motion to Amend the Complaint an denying as moot 69 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/9/10. (Kaminski, H)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT LTD, Plaintiffs, v. SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. / ----oo0oo---Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint (Docket No. 65) is GRANTED. Defendant's motion to
NO. CIV. 2:09-2304 WBS KJN ORDER
dismiss plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (Docket No. 69) is therefore DENIED as moot. Defendants have thirty days from the
date of this Order to respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED:
IT IS SO ORDERED. August 9, 2010
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
