Townsend v. Sisto et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/20/14 ordering plaintiff's request that the court direct the clerk of court to issue 10 subpoenas 59 is denied. Plaintiff's request that the court direct the clerk of court to pro vide plaintiff with a status report to the pending motion before this court is denied. Plaintiff's request that the court order defendants Cherry, Junker and Singh to file their answer is denied. Plaintiff's request that the court reconsider the 02/27/14 denial of his 1/24/14 motion to compel is denied. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM TOWNSEND, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:09-cv-2342 CKD P

v.

ORDER

D.K. SISTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff has filed a document in which he makes several requests. First, he asks that the

17
18

court direct the Clerk of the Court to issue ten subpoenas and send them to plaintiff. This request

19

will be denied. If plaintiff wishes to obtain issued subpoenas, he must specify in his request who

20

the subpoenas are for and what documents he seeks.
Second, plaintiff asks that the court direct the Clerk of the Court to provide plaintiff with a

21
22

status report as to “the Pending Motion before this court.” However, there are no pending

23

motions.
Third, plaintiff asks that the court order defendants Cherry, Junker and Singh to file their

24
25

answer. However, their answer was filed last October. ECF No. 47.
Finally, plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the February 27, 2014 denial of the “motion to

26
27

compel” he filed January 24, 2014. Plaintiff fails to point to any reason why the court should

28

/////
1

1

reconsider the February 27, 2014 order or address any of the reasons identified by the court as to

2

why his motion to compel was denied. His request for reconsideration will therefore be denied.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY OREDERED that:

4

1. Plaintiff’s request that the court direct the Clerk of the Court to issue ten subpoenas

5
6
7
8
9
10

and send them to plaintiff (ECF No. 59) is denied.
2. Plaintiff’s request that the court direct the Clerk of the Court to provide plaintiff with a
status report as to “the Pending Motion before this court” is denied.
3. Plaintiff’s request that the court order defendants Cherry, Junker and Singh to file their
answer is denied.
4. Plaintiff’s request that the court reconsider the February 27, 2014 denial of his January

11

24, 2014 “motion to compel” is denied.

12

Dated: March 20, 2014

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

1
town2342.abs(2)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2