Townsend v. Sisto et al

Filing 95

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/14/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's counsel's request for leave to withdraw leaving plaintiff pro se is denied without prejudice to renewal within 7 days. If plaintiff's counsel wishes to appear telephonically at the hearing on his motion to withdraw, he should so request in his motion. The motions filed by plaintiff pro se on August 31, 2015 (ECF No. 92 & 93 ) are DENIED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM TOWNSEND, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:09-cv-2342 CKD P

v.

ORDER

D.K. SISTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On August 31, 2015, plaintiff’s counsel filed a document seeking permission to withdraw

18

leaving plaintiff pro se. Because counsel did not comply with Local Rule 182(d) that request will

19

be denied. The court will also deny the two motions filed by plaintiff pro se on August 31, 2015.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. Plaintiff’s counsel’s request for leave to withdraw leaving plaintiff pro se is denied

22

without prejudice to renewal within 7 days. If the motion for withdrawal is renewed, the motion

23

must comply with Local Rule 182(d). If plaintiff’s counsel wishes to appear telephonically at the

24

hearing on his motion to withdraw, he should so request in his motion.

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

2. The motions filed by plaintiff pro se on August 31, 2015 (ECF No. 92 & 93) are

2

denied.

3

Dated: September 14, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
town2342.ssub

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2