BLX Capital, LLC v. Dara Petroleum, Inc. et al
Filing
83
JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND ORDER OF SALE dated *1/17/12* signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/13/12. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LEO D. PLOTKIN (SBN 101893)
JOHN P. MERTENS (SBN 252762)
LEVY, SMALL & LALLAS
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
815 Moraga Drive
Los Angeles, California 90049
Telephone: (310) 471-3000
Facsimile: (310) 471-7990
Attorneys for Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA,
National Association, as Indenture Trustee
for the benefit of the Noteholders and the
Certificateholders of Business Loan
Express Business Loan Trust 2005-A
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
HSBC BANK USA, National Association,
as Indenture Trustee for the benefit of the
Noteholders and the Certificateholders of
Business Loan Express Business Loan
Trust 2005-A,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
vs.
DARA PETROLEUM, INC. dba WATT
AVENUE EXXON, a California
corporation; SARBJIT S. KANG, an
individual; NARGES EGHTESADI, an
individual; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION, a United States
government agency; and DOES 1 through
20, inclusive,
21
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 2:09-cv-02356-WBS-EFB
JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE
AND ORDER OF SALE
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation for Judgment of Foreclosure and Order of Sale
2
entered into by and between plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as
3
Indenture Trustee for the benefit of the Noteholders and the Certificateholders of
4
Business Loan Express Business Loan Trust 2005-A (“HSBC as Trustee”),
5
successor in interest to BLX Capital, LLC (“BLX”), and defendants Dara
6
Petroleum, Inc. dba Watt Avenue Exxon (“Dara”), Sarbjit S. Kang (“Kang”),
7
Narges Eghtesadi (“Eghtesadi” and together with Kang the “Guarantors”),
8
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1.
HSBC as Trustee shall have judgment against Dara and the
Guarantors (collectively, “Obligors”), jointly and severally, as herein provided.
2.
Obligors, and each of them, jointly and severally, are indebted to
HSBC as Trustee in the following sums:
a.
14
Principal, accrued interest, late fees, attorney’s fees and costs
15
and other chargeable expenses incurred as of January 10, 2012, in the total
16
amount of $ 985,776.75;
b.
17
18
Interest accruing from and after January 11, 2012 at the daily
rate of $ 263.64 through the date of entry of the Judgment;
19
c.
Actual costs of foreclosure and sale hereunder; and
20
d.
Interest on the amounts set forth in subparagraphs (a) through
21
(c) above (which together shall be referred to hereinafter as the
22
“Indebtedness”) at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of entry of the
23
Judgment.
24
3.
The real and personal property hereinafter described may be sold in
25
the manner prescribed by law, and the Order of Sale will issue to the Sheriff of the
26
County of Sacramento, ordering and directing him or her to conduct such sale.
27
28
2
4.
1
From the proceeds of the sale, the Sheriff shall pay to HSBC as
2
Trustee, after deducting the actual costs and expenses of sale, the sums adjudged
3
due.
4
5
5.
The following property is the subject of this Judgment of Foreclosure:
a.
Dara’s interest in certain real property commonly known as
6
3449 El Camino Avenue, Sacramento, California 95821 (“Property”),
7
together with all buildings and improvements thereon, including the fixtures,
8
attachments, appliances, equipment, machinery and other articles attached
9
thereto and Dara’s personal property and other assets associated with the
10
11
Property (the “Collateral”).
b.
The Property is legally described as follows:
12
PARCEL 1:
13
The South 200 feet of the East 250 feet of Lot 245 of Del Paso Park
View Tract No. 2 according to the official plat thereof, filed in the
office of the Recorder of Sacramento County, California, on June
7,1913, in Book 14 of Maps, Map No. 33.
14
15
16
The Subdivision of said Lot 245 being made on the basis that the lot
area included one-half of the adjoining roads.
17
PARCEL 2:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The North 10482 feet of the South 304.82 feet of the East 250 feet of
Lot 245 of Del Paso View Tract No- 2, according to the official plat
thereof filed in the office of the County Recorder of Sacramento
County, California on June 7,1913, in Book 14 of Maps, at page 33.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof lying within that
certain parcel described in the “Certification of Compliance-Lawfiul
Parcel” issued by the County Surveyor of Sacramento County, dated
September 14, 1988, and recorded September 16, 1988, in Book
880916, page I001,Official Records, more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 245 and the center
line of Waft Avenue, located North 01 degrees 45 minutes 30 seconds
West 230.00 feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot 245 said
Southeast corner being the intersection of the center lines of Waft
Avenue and El Camino Avenue, as shown on said plat, thence from
said point of beginning parallel with the South line of Lot 245, South
89 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds West 250~00 feet; thence parallel
with the East line of said Lot 245, North 01 degrees 46 minutes 30
3
1
2
3
seconds West 74.82 feet; thence parallel with the South line of said
Lot 245 North 89 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds East 250~00 feet to
the East line of said Lot 245 arid the center line of said Watt Avenue;
thence along said East line South 01 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds
East 74.82 feet to the point of beginning.
4
The subdivision of said Lot 245 being made on the basis that the lot
area included one-half of the adjoining road.
5
6.
6
7
If any surplus remains after making the payments specified in
paragraph 2 above, the surplus shall be paid to Dara.
7.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine the amount of any
8
deficiency after the sale, in accordance with section 726(b) of the California Code
9
of Civil Procedure, and to enter a Deficiency Judgment against Dara and the
10
11
Guarantors, jointly and severally, which shall reflect the amount so determined.
8.
Having sold any and all rights of redemption with respect to the
12
Property and Collateral (or any part of it) to HSBC as Trustee, Obligors, and each
13
of them, are forever barred from any right of redemption. At the time of the sale,
14
upon HSBC as Trustee’s surrender to the Sheriff of the rights of redemption
15
purchased by HSBC as Trustee from the Obligors, the Sheriff may immediately
16
execute a deed of sale to the purchaser, who may then take possession of the
17
Property and Collateral, or the part thereof so purchased, if necessary with the
18
assistance of the Sheriff of Sacramento County.
19
9.
Obligors, and all persons claiming from or under them, or any one or
20
more of them, and all persons having liens subsequent to those of HSBC as Trustee
21
by judgment or decree on the Property and Collateral (or any part of it), and their
22
personal representatives, and all persons having any lien or claim by or under such
23
subsequent judgment or decree, and their heirs or personal representatives, and all
24
persons claiming to have acquired any estate or interest in the Property and
25
Collateral (or any part of it) subsequent to the recording of the notice of pendency
26
of this action with the Sacramento County Recorder, are forever barred and
27
foreclosed from all equity of redemption in and claim to the Property and
28
4
1
Collateral, and every part thereof, from and after delivery of the deed of sale by the
2
Sheriff.
3
4
DATED: January 13, 2012
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
PRESENTED BY:
12
LEO D. PLOTKIN
JOHN P. MERTENS
LEVY, SMALL & LALLAS
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By:
/s/ John P. Mertens
JOHN P. MERTENS
Attorneys for Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA,
National Association, as Indenture Trustee
for the benefit of the Noteholders and the
Certificateholders of Business Loan
Express Business Loan Trust 2005-A
25996
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?