Sutherland v. Herrmann et al
Filing
104
ORDER ADOPTING 103 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/26/13. 95 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P
vs.
S. HERRMANN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On February 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 5, 2013, are adopted in full;
2
2. The April 25, 2012 motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of
3
defendants Spinks and Parmar (Doc. No. 95) is denied; and
4
5
3. The matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DATED: February 26, 2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
/suth2391.801sj
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?