Sutherland v. Herrmann et al

Filing 134

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/22/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 131 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 123 125 126 130 . (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P

v.

ORDER

S. HERMANN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 8, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 8, 2014, are adopted in full.

3

2. The motions to vacate settlement (Docket Nos. 123, 125 and 126) and the motion to

4

vacate the settlement or in the alternative for breach of settlement agreement (Docket No. 130)

5

are DENIED.

6

Dated: September 22, 2014

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

hm
suth2391.805

27
28
2