Sutherland v. Herrmann et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/12/10 ordering that within 20 days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 10 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Sutherland v. Herrmann et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff requests leave to depose three inmate witnesses, but he has only identified two inmates in the motion. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND, Plaintiff, vs. S. HERRMANN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to depose plaintiff's incarcerated witnesses. Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga, California, seeks permission to take the deposition of two inmates incarcerated at California State Prison-Sacramento.1 Plaintiff alleges that these inmates were incarcerated with him at the time of the events alleged in the complaint and were first hand witnesses thereto. ///// ///// ///// ORDER No. CIV S-09-2391 WBS DAD P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:12 suth2391.o Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within ten days thereafter. DATED: November 12, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?