Sutherland v. Herrmann et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/12 denying without prejudice 94 Motion. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-09-2391 WBS DAD P

vs.
S. HERRMANN, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

17

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 5, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for an order allowing him to serve

18

subpoenas duces tecum on non-parties to this action. Discovery is closed in this action and

19

defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s motion for an order allowing

20

service of subpoenas duces tecum on non-parties to this action will be denied without prejudice

21

to plaintiff’s right to file, as appropriate, a request pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

22

56(d) in opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment.

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 5,

2

2012 motion (Docket No. 94) is denied without prejudice.

3

DATED: May 22, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9

DAD:12
suth2391.dis4

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2