Williams v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/12/10 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; completed IFP form or appropriate fee due within 30 days. The clerk is directed to send plainfiff a new IFP form for a non-prisoner. (Williams, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff will be ordered to file a new in forma pauperis affidavit for a non-prisoner or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's August 27, 2009 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is denied without prejudice; 2. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner on the form provided by ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIONEL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2416 LKK DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Non-Prisoner. DATED: April 12, 2010.

DAD:4 will2416.3a

2