Gant v. Bosenko et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/11/2012 ORDERING that defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
TONY AUSTIN GANT,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
vs.
TOM BOSENKO, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
No. 2:09-cv-2439 WBS KJN P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
13
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
14
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
15
On December 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
16
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
17
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days.
18
Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
19
The court has reviewed the file and finds defendants’ unopposed motion for
20
summary judgment to have merit. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s
21
motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
22
23
DATED: January 11, 2012
24
25
26
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?