United States of America v. Sierra Pacific Industries et al
Filing
477
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/25/2012 RESETTING the deadline for filing the joint Pretrial Statement to 6/7/2012. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
11
12
NO. CIV S-09-2445 KJM-EFB
v.
13
SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES; et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Defendants have filed an ex parte application for leave to file separate pretrial
17
statements, to which plaintiff objects. (ECF 475 & 476.) The court ordered parties to file a joint
18
pretrial statement by May 31, 2012. Defendants contend plaintiff represented it would share its
19
portion of the statement one week before it was due. (Underwood Decl. ¶ 2, ECF 475-2.)
20
Emails from plaintiff’s counsel to defense counsel indicate that plaintiff intends to share its
21
portion “early next week” (the week of May 28). (Thomas Decl., Ex. A, ECF 475-1.) Local
22
Rule 281(a)(2) does not provide a deadline for counsels’ sharing of the statement, nor does it
23
provide instructions as to how the statement should be created. Presumably the rule was drafted
24
with the assumption that common sense and professionalism would guide counsel. With this in
25
mind, the court hereby resets the deadline for filing the joint pretrial statement to June 7, 2012.
26
Counsel shall meet and confer to ensure all parties have sufficient time, within this new deadline,
1
1
to contribute to the preparation of the joint pretrial statement. All other deadlines remain
2
unchanged.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 25, 2012.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?