Benyamini v. Forshythe et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/11 ordering that plaintiff's motions 36 , 37 are denied. The court will not respond to future filings by petitioner that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT P. BENYAMINI, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. M. FORSYTHE, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-09-2453 GEB EFB P On May 20, 2011, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending 17 this action be dismissed because of plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. On July 13, 2011, the 18 assigned district judge adopted that recommendation and dismissed this action. Judgment was 19 entered accordingly. Notwithstanding that judgment closing this case, plaintiff has filed a 20 request for appointment of counsel, a motion for emergency transfer, and a request for an 21 emergency stay. 22 District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in 23 section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 24 exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a 25 plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood 26 v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no 1 1 exceptional circumstances in this case. Moreover, because this case is closed, plaintiff is not 2 entitled to the requested emergency transfer or emergency stay. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions, Dckt. Nos. 36, 37, are 4 denied. The court will not respond to future filings by petitioner that are not authorized by the 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 6 DATED: October 19, 2011. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?