McCarthy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al

Filing 134

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/26/2011 DENYING 130 Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Continue Plaintiffs' Motion for Statutory Attorneys' Fees. If counsel for either side wishes to appear by telephone at the hearing on the motion, they may do so by informing the court and opposing counsel on or before Thursday, July 28, 2011. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA MCCARTHY, KATHERINE SCHMITT, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 15 Case No. 2:09-CV-02495-WBS-DAD ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR STATUTORY ATTORNEYS’ FEES R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 16 Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Ex Parte Application to Continue Plaintiffs’ Motion 17 for Statutory Attorneys’ Fees from August 1, 2011, to August 29, 2011, is hereby DENIED. If 18 counsel for either side wishes to appear by telephone at the hearing on the motion, they may do so 19 by informing the court and opposing counsel on or before Thursday, July 28, 2011. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: July 26, 2011 23 24 25 26 Firmwide:102960332.1 006886.1028 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APP. TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR STATUTORY ATTORNEYS’ FEES (NO. 09-CV-02495-WBS-DAD) 1.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?