McCarthy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
Filing
134
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/26/2011 DENYING 130 Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Continue Plaintiffs' Motion for Statutory Attorneys' Fees. If counsel for either side wishes to appear by telephone at the hearing on the motion, they may do so by informing the court and opposing counsel on or before Thursday, July 28, 2011. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VICTORIA MCCARTHY, KATHERINE
SCHMITT,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
15
Case No. 2:09-CV-02495-WBS-DAD
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT R.J.
REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
STATUTORY ATTORNEYS’ FEES
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., and
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
16
Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Ex Parte Application to Continue Plaintiffs’ Motion
17
for Statutory Attorneys’ Fees from August 1, 2011, to August 29, 2011, is hereby DENIED. If
18
counsel for either side wishes to appear by telephone at the hearing on the motion, they may do so
19
by informing the court and opposing counsel on or before Thursday, July 28, 2011.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: July 26, 2011
23
24
25
26
Firmwide:102960332.1 006886.1028
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Treat Towers
1255 Treat Boulevard
Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.932.2468
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX
PARTE APP. TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
STATUTORY ATTORNEYS’ FEES
(NO. 09-CV-02495-WBS-DAD)
1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?