McNeely v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING 64 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/14/2010. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
(HC) McNeely v. County of Sacramento et al
Doc. 65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. S. M. SALINAS, Warden, Respondent. / On June 22, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed June 11, 2010, denying petitioner's June 4, 2010, request that his notice of voluntary dismissal be disregarded. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DOCK MCNEELY, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2520 WBS GGH P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/mcne2520.850
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 11, 2010, is affirmed. DATED: July 14, 2010
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
