Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, et al., v. United States Forest Service, et al

Filing 106

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/23/2012 GRANTING in part plaintiffs' 88 Motion for Partial Vacatur. But it is ONLY to the degree it seeks to set aside that portion of Forest Services decision designating 42 roads through meadows for motorized vehicle traffic. That portion of decision is REMANDED to Forest Service for reconsideration in light of applicable law. The Forest Service directed to submit Proposed Order, no later than 30 days from date of Order, that will set aside only that portion of its decision that designates the 42 roads to degree they go through meadows, and not affecting sections of those same roads that do not go through meadows, unless they cannot otherwise be reached. Plaintiffs and Intervenors shal l have 14 days to respond to Proposed Order. Parties have advised Court that 42 roads are currently closed because of seasonal closings. But that seasonal closings end on 3/31/2012. Accordingly, the Forest Service shall EXTEND the seasonal closings of 42 roads until further Order of Court. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, et al., NO. CIV. S-09-2523 LKK/JFM Plaintiff, 11 12 v. O R D E R 13 UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 Plaintiffs’ motion for partial vacatur (Dkt. No. 88), having 17 come on for hearing on February 13, 2012, the court orders as 18 follows: 19 1. Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART, but only to the 20 degree it seeks to set aside that portion of the Forest 21 Service’s decision that designates 42 roads through 22 meadows for motorized vehicle traffic. 23 the decision is remanded to the Forest Service for 24 reconsideration in light of the applicable law. 25 26 2. That portion of The Forest Service is directed to submit a proposed order that will set aside only that portion of its 1 1 decision that designates the 42 roads to the degree they 2 go through meadows, and not affecting the sections of 3 those same roads that do not go through meadows, unless 4 they cannot otherwise be reached. 5 3. The Forest Service shall submit the proposed order no 6 later than 30 days from the date of this order. 7 parties cannot agree on a joint submission, plaintiffs 8 and Intervenors shall have 14 days to respond to the 9 proposed order. 10 4. If the The parties have advised the court that the 42 roads are 11 currently closed because of seasonal closings, but that 12 the 13 Accordingly, 14 seasonal closings of the 42 roads until further order of 15 this court. seasonal 16 DATED: the Forest IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 closings February 13, 2012. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 end on Service March shall 31, 2012. EXTEND the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?