Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, et al., v. United States Forest Service, et al

Filing 134

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/27/2013 STAYING Plaintiffs' 118 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs until 4/26/2013; ORDERING the parties to advise the Court on the status of their settlement discussions by 4/26/2013. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 David A. Bahr (OSB No. 90199) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 Voice davebahr@mindspring.com Lisa T. Belenky (CSB No. 203225) Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 436-9682 x307 Voice lbelenky@biologicaldiversity.org Erik Schlenker-Goodrich (New Mexico Bar No. 7875) Western Environmental Law Center P.O. Box 1507 Taos, New Mexico 87571 (575) 613-4197 Voice eriksg@westernlaw.org 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division JASON A. HILL (DC 477543) JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458) Trial Attorneys Natural Resources Section J. BRETT GROSKO (Maryland Bar) Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice Benjamin Franklin Station, P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 Tel: 202-514-1024 (Hill) 202-305-3022 (Tustin) 202-305-0342 (Grosko) Fax: 202-305-0506 (Hill and Tustin) 202-305-0275 (Grosko) Jason.Hill2@usdoj.gov John.Tustin@usdoj.gov Brett.Grosko@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 5 CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, and FOREST ISSUES GROUP, non-profit corporations, 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, vs. RAMIRO VILLALVAZO, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Eldorado National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 13 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS Federal Defendants, 11 12 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM and CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF 4 WHEEL DRIVE CLUBS, et al., 14 15 Defendant-Intervenors. 16 17 18 Whereas by order dated January 2, 2013, the Court stayed briefing on Plaintiffs’ petition for costs and attorneys’ fees until February 26, 2013, by which time the Parties were to advise the Court on the 19 status of the their settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 132; 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have continued to engage in substantive good-faith discussions attempting to negotiate a settlement of the issue of costs and attorneys’ fees; Whereas as a result of these discussions, the Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have made substantive progress toward reaching a settlement; Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants desire more time to explore settlement of the costs and attorneys’ fees; 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 2 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 Whereas Defendant-Intervenors have not participated in the negotiations, and thus have not 2 formed a position, but have been consulted regarding this stipulation and do not oppose any request that 3 the primary parties continue negotiations; 4 Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants stipulate and agree, and request that the Court 5 enter an order staying through April 26, 2013, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for attorneys’ 6 7 8 fees and costs, at which time the Parties will advise the Court on the status of the their settlement discussions. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed schedule for 9 briefing the fee petition. By entering into this Stipulation, Federal Defendants do not waive any defenses 10 as to whether Plaintiffs are entitled to any attorneys’ fees, costs or expenses in this case. 11 Respectfully submitted on February 26, 2013. 12 IGNACIA S. MORENO 13 Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ David A. Bahr (with permission) _____________________________ David A. Bahr Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 /s/ J. Brett Grosko ____________________ Jason A. Hill John P. Tustin Trial Attorneys Natural Resources Section Lisa T. Belenky Center for Biological Diversity 351 California St., Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 J. Brett Grosko Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Attorneys for Federal Defendants 23 Erik Schlenker-Goodrich Western Environmental Law Center P.O. Box 1507 Taos, NM 87571 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 3 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 ORDER 2 This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ and Federal Defendants’ stipulation 3 and proposed order regarding the deadline for motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, and the Court being 4 fully advised in the premises and good cause appearing; 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that briefing on Plaintiffs’ application for fees and costs is stayed 6 7 8 9 10 until April 26, 2013, at which time the Parties will advise the Court on the status of the their settlement discussions. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed schedule for briefing the fee petition. Dated this 27th of February, 2013. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 4 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?