Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, et al., v. United States Forest Service, et al

Filing 138

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/26/2013 STAYING 118 Application for Fees and Costs until 9/5/2013; ORDERING the parties to submit a proposed schedule for briefing the fee petition if no agreement appears forthcoming. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 David A. Bahr (OSB No. 90199) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 Voice davebahr@mindspring.com Lisa T. Belenky (CSB No. 203225) Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 436-9682 x307 Voice lbelenky@biologicaldiversity.org Erik Schlenker-Goodrich (New Mexico Bar No. 7875) Western Environmental Law Center P.O. Box 1507 Taos, New Mexico 87571 (575) 613-4197 Voice eriksg@westernlaw.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division JASON A. HILL (DC 477543) JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458) Trial Attorneys Natural Resources Section J. BRETT GROSKO (Maryland Bar) Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice Benjamin Franklin Station, P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 Tel: 202-514-1024 (Hill) 202-305-3022 (Tustin) 202-305-0342 (Grosko) Fax: 202-305-0506 (Hill and Tustin) 202-305-0275 (Grosko) Jason.Hill2@usdoj.gov John.Tustin@usdoj.gov Brett.Grosko@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL 4 DIVERSITY, and FOREST ISSUES GROUP, non-profit corporations, 5 Plaintiffs, 6 vs. 7 RAMIRO VILLALVAZO, in his official capacity 8 as Forest Supervisor for the Eldorado National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 9 10 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS Defendants, and 11 CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF 4 WHEEL DRIVE 12 CLUBS, et al., 13 Defendant-Intervenors. 14 15 16 Whereas by order dated April 26, 2013, the Court stayed briefing on Plaintiffs’ petition for costs and attorney fees until July 25, 2013, by which time the Parties were to advise the Court on the status of 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 the their settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 136; Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have engaged in substantive good-faith discussions attempting to negotiate a settlement of the issue of costs and attorney fees; Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have identified terms for an agreement in principle that resolves Plaintiffs’ claim for costs and attorney fees and drafted a proposed agreement; Whereas the proposed agreement remains subject to the review and approval by the appropriate 24 supervisory officials at the Department of Justice and Department of Agriculture; 25 26 27 Whereas the Federal Defendants estimate that it will take approximately six additional weeks to complete the review and gain approval of the proposed agreement by the appropriate supervisory 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 2 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 2 3 officials at the Department of Justice and Department of Agriculture; Whereas Defendant-Intervenors have not participated in the negotiations, and thus have not formed a position, but have been consulted regarding this stipulation, and do not oppose any request that 4 the primary parties continue negotiations; 5 6 Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants stipulate and agree, and request that the Court 7 enter an order staying until September 5, 2013, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for attorneys’ 8 fees, costs, and other expenses. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed 9 schedule for briefing the fee petition. By entering into this Stipulation, Federal Defendants do not waive 10 any defenses as to whether Plaintiffs are entitled to any attorneys’ fees, costs or expenses in this case. 11 Respectfully submitted on July 25, 2013. 12 ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ David A. Bahr (with permission) David A. Bahr Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 /s/ John P. Tustin Jason A. Hill John P. Tustin Trial Attorneys Natural Resources Section Lisa T. Belenky Center for Biological Diversity 351 California St., Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 J. Brett Grosko Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Federal Defendants Erik Schlenker-Goodrich Western Environmental Law Center P.O. Box 1507 Taos, NM 87571 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 3 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM 1 2 3 ORDER This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ and Federal Defendants’ stipulation and proposed order regarding the deadline for motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, and the Court being 4 fully advised in the premises and good cause appearing; 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that briefing on Plaintiffs’ application for fees and costs is stayed 7 until September 5, 2013. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed 8 schedule for briefing the fee petition. 9 Dated this 26th of July, 2013. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 4 Case No. 2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?