Xabandith v. Horel
Filing
40
ORDER adopting 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/10/11: Petitioner's motion to amend is denied 31 . (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PHANHAHA XABANDITH,
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
13
No. CIV S-09-2550 LKK DAD P
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ,
Respondent.
14
ORDER
/
15
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
16
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 12, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
19
20
herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days.
22
Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
2
3
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 12, 2011, are adopted in full;
and
2. Petitioner’s motion to amend (Doc. No. 31) is denied.
DATED: November 10, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?