Mathis v. Russell, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/03/10 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 GGH:035 math2558.fta IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CARDELL VAN MATHIS, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD RUSSELL, et al., Defendants. / On October 15, 2009, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket # 9). By order filed March 15, 2010, plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint within twenty-eight days. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: June 3, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ______________________________ U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER No. CIV S-09-2558 GGH P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?