Jefferson v. Save Mart Supermarket et al

Filing 58

ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/14/11 CONTINUING hearing on 53 Motion for Attorneys Fees to 8/5/11 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Plaintiff's opposition due by 7/22/20 11, Defendants reply due by 7/29/2011. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 for failing to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendants motion incompliance with Local Rule 230(c). Show Cause Response due by 7/22/2011. A hearing on the order to show cause, if necessary, will follow the hearing on the motion. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES EDWARD JEFFERSON, 11 12 NO. 2:09-cv-2562 FCD GGH PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS 13 SAVE MART SUPERMARKET, 14 et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ----oo0oo---- 17 18 1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees 19 (Docket No. 53) is continued to August 5, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. 20 Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition brief or notice of 21 non-opposition no later than July 22, 2011. The defendants may 22 file and serve a reply on or before July 29, 2011. 23 2. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why he should not be 24 sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 for failing to file an 25 opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendants’ motion in 26 compliance with Local Rule 230(c). 27 3. Plaintiff shall file his response to the order to show 28 cause on or before July 22, 2011. 1 4. A hearing on the order to show cause, if necessary, 2 will follow the hearing on the motion. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: July 14, 2011 5 6 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?