Khudoy et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/26/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 15 are ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(b); dfts' motion to dismiss 7 is DENIED AS MOOT; and the clerk is directed to close this case.(Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, and Does 1-250, No. CIV S-09-2569 MCE EFB PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VLADIMIR KHUDOY; LYUDMILA KHUDOY, On December 15, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADOPTED; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2009, are 2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiffs' failure to prosecute the action; 3. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 7, is denied as moot; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Dated: February 26, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?