Pombrio v. Salinas

Filing 33

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/5/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(HC) Pombrio v. Salinas Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. S.M. SALINAS, Respondent. / By order filed June 10, 2010, petitioner was granted thirty days in which to file an application for writ of habeas corpus or a civil rights complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT E. POMBRIO, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2577 WBS KJM P FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: August 5, 2010. 1 pomb2577.fta 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?