Nguyen v. Burt et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/20/2011 ORDERING that dfts shall inform this court in writing, w/in 7 days, whether they have any objections to the dismissal of this action. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TRI NGUYEN,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. 2:09-cv-2595 KJM KJN P

DOCTOR BURT, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, in this civil rights action

16
17

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that this action be dismissed. (Dkt. No.

18

34.) The court acknowledges plaintiff’s statement that his request is motivated by plaintiff’s

19

desire to contribute to the fiscal stability of the United States, to “save our country’s money for

20

our va[lu]e need” (sic), and “to help our country get better!” (Id. at 1.)
Because defendants have been served and appeared in this action, the court will

21
22

inquire of defendants whether dismissal of this action would be prejudicial to defendants.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall inform this court

24

in writing, within seven days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of this action. A

25

statement of non-opposition to plaintiff’s request, or the failure to file a timely response, will

26

////

1

result in the granting of plaintiff’s request pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

2

DATED: May 20, 2011

3
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

nguy2595.59a