O'Leary v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
56
[DISREGARD- DUPLICATE of 55 Order] DISORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2012 PROVIDING the Plaintiff 21 days to file additional evidentiary submissions, if he wishes, re 48 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. (Michel, G) Modified on 7/12/2012 (Donati, J).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GARY FRANCIS O’LEARY,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2:09-cv-2601 GEB CKD P
Defendant.
ORDER
vs.
CLARK
/
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
This court issued findings and recommendations on June 22, 2012 which recommended that the
18
second amended complaint be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative
19
remedies. (See Dkt. No. 53.) Plaintiff thereafter filed objections to the findings and
20
recommendations. Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-
21
15548, 09-16113, – F.3d –, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the court hereby reminds
22
plaintiff of the following requirements for opposing the motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust
23
administrative remedies made by defendant pursuant to non-enumerated Rule 12(b) of the
24
25
26
1
1
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which was filed by defendant on February 13, 2012.1 Such a
2
motion is a request for dismissal of unexhausted claims without prejudice. The defendant may
3
submit affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documentation to
4
support the motion to dismiss. To oppose the motion, plaintiff may likewise file declarations
5
under penalty of perjury and admissible documentation. Plaintiff may rely upon statements made
6
under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal
7
knowledge of the matters state and the plaintiff calls to the court’s attention those parts of the
8
complaint upon which plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or
9
declarations by other persons who have personal knowledge of relevant matters. Plaintiff may
10
also rely upon written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff claims
11
they are. If plaintiff fails to contradict defendant’s evidence with admissible evidence, the court
12
may rely on the defendant’s evidence. In the event both sides submit matters outside the
13
pleadings, the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact. If
14
plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, the court may consider the
15
failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. If the defendant’s motion to
16
dismiss, whether opposed or unopposed, is granted, plaintiff’s unexhausted claims will be
17
dismissed without prejudice.
18
19
Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations
not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value.
20
Plaintiff will be provided twenty-one (21) days to file additional evidentiary
21
materials if he wishes regarding the motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative
22
remedies.
23
/////
24
/////
25
1
26
Plaintiff was also advised of these requirements on December 12, 2011. (See Dkt. No.
42.)
2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall have twenty-one (21)
2
days from the date of this order to file additional evidentiary submissions if he wishes regarding
3
the motion to dismiss, but it is not required. No extensions of time will be given.
4
Dated: July 11, 2012
5
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
7
olea2601.not
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?