Benyamini v. Mendoza et al
Filing
124
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/26/12 ORDERING that In light of Plaintiff's failure to provide the filing fee in full in accordance with this Court's order, filed on 8/13/12 119 , this case is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's repetitive and/or otherwise defective motions/requests, filed on 5/30/12 112 ; 7/2/12 118 ; 8/31/12 120 are VACATED as moot. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT P. BENYAMINI,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-09-2602 LKK GGH P
MENDOZA, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on August 13, 2012, defendants’ motion to
18
revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, filed on September 13, 2011, was granted and
19
plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days to pay the filing fee in full. In the August 13th order,
20
plaintiff was informed that should he fail to pay the fee within that period of time, the case would
21
be dismissed. Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee in full and the time for doing so has
22
expired.1
23
\\\\\
24
\\\\\\
25
1
26
Plaintiff’s pending repetitive and/or otherwise defective motions/requests, at docket #
112, # 118 and # 120, are vacated as moot.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. In light of plaintiff’s failure to provide the filing fee in full in accordance with
3
4
this court’s order, filed on August 13, 2012 (docket # 119), this case is dismissed.
2. Plaintiff’s repetitive and/or otherwise defective motions/requests, filed on
5
May 30, 2012 (docket # 112); July 2, 2012 (docket # 118); August 31, 2012 (docket # 120), are
6
vacated as moot.
7
DATED: November 26, 2012.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?