Benyamini v. Mendoza et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/4/10 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 27 filed are adopted in full; a stay is not re-imposed pursuant to plaintiff's filings 25 26 ; these requests are denied; and this matter proceeds pursuant to order of the magistrate judge, filed on 9/28/10 24 . (Becknal, R)

(PC) Benyamini v. Mendoza et al

Doc. 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MENDOZA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 19, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT P. BENYAMINI, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2602 LKK GGH P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 19, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. A stay is not re-imposed pursuant to plaintiff's filings of September 30, 2010 (Docket # 25) and October 12, 2010 (Docket # 26); these requests are denied; and this matter proceeds pursuant to order of the magistrate judge, filed on September 28, 2010 (Docket # 24). DATED: November 4, 2010.

2