Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file a Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, on or before 5/28/2010. The Court's Scheduling shall be amended accordingly. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

BESS M. BREWER, #100364 LAW OFFICE OF BESS M. BREWER & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 5088 Sacramento, CA 95817 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA J. ORTIZ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 //// 24 25 26 27 28 //// //// //// //// 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Plaintiff's time to file the summary judgment in this case is hereby extended from April 26, 2010, to May 28, 2010. This is plaintiff's first request for an extension and it is required due to Plaintiff's counsel's impacted briefing schedule. v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America, Defendant. ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 09-cv-02641-KJN

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Dated: April 26, 2010

/s/Bess M. Brewer BESS M. BREWER Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: April 27, 2010

Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney /s/ Leslie Alexander LESLIE ALEXANDER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Attorney for Defendant ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, plaintiff shall file a motion for summary 13 judgment, if any, on or before May 28, 2010. The court's scheduling order shall be amended 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE accordingly. Plaintiff will not be granted further extensions of time to file a motion for summary judgment absent a showing of good cause. The undersigned recognizes the burden on counsel to manage an active case load and prepare motions for summary judgment in fact-intensive cases such as this one. Nevertheless, plaintiff's reliance on her attorney's impacted briefing schedule as the basis for any further request for an extension of time will not necessarily constitute, by itself, good cause for such an extension. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 28, 2010

2