Johnson v. Power et al
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/22/10 ORDERING that pursuant to the 25 Stipulation, Deft Michael S. Cagle is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Owen, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 09-cv-02688-MCE-KJN STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MICHAEL S. CAGLE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER {FRCP 41 (a)(1)}
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs.
Travis Wade Power, et al Defendants Complaint Filed: SEPTEMBER 28, 2009
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT, Defendant, MICHAEL S. CAGLE, is hereby dismissed WITHOUT prejudice. Defendants James Nielson and Diane Nielson were terminated WITH prejudice on November 19, 2009. Defendants Travis Wade Power and Pavia, Inc. were terminated WITH prejudice on February 19, 2010.
1 STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER CIV: S-09-cv-02688-MCE-KJN
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: June 8, 2010
/s/Scott N. Johnson______________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: June 9, 2010
/s/Michael S. Cagle_______________ MICHAEL S. CAGLE, Defendant in Pro Per ORDER
Good cause appearing, Defendant, MICHAEL S. CAGLE, is hereby dismissed WITHOUT
prejudice. As there are no Defendants remaining, the Clerk is directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: June 22, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2 STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER CIV: S-09-cv-02688-MCE-KJN
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?