Cyprian v. Givens et al
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/22/2011 adopting 64 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; GRANTING 33 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Newman. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LAWRENCE CYPRIAN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
No. 2:09-cv-2704 JAM JFM (PC)
vs.
13
DERRICK GIVENS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On June 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations and defendant Newman has filed a response to
23
the objections.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
25
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
/////
1
1
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
2
proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 8, 2011, are adopted in full; and
5
2. Defendant Newman’s December 7, 2010 motion for summary judgment is
6
granted.
7
DATED: July 22, 2011
8
9
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?